Abstract
Based on ethnographic research in the Los Angeles area and interviews with Zapotec migrants, the author analyzes what it was that made it possible in spring 2006 for these migrants to come out to demonstrate
en masse. This empirical material is analyzed using Nancy Fraser’s theoretical reflections about the public space, and the author argues that the mobilization was possible thanks to the opening up of many “subordinate counter-publics” where public opinion, solidarity, and collective identity were produced. This made it possible for the moral indignation sparked by the bill to turn into an unprecedented collective mobilization.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Copyright Retention and License Grant:
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal a non-exclusive right of first publication. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to share and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided they give appropriate credit to the author and acknowledge the work’s initial publication in this journal.
Additional Distribution: Authors are free to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., posting to an institutional repository, publishing in a book, or other distribution), provided they acknowledge the work’s initial publication in this journal.
Pre- and Post-Publication Sharing: Authors are permitted and encouraged to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories, personal websites, or academic platforms) before, during, or after the submission process, as this can foster productive exchanges and increase the visibility and citation of the published work, subject to the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.